‘Jai Bhim’ director expresses remorse, says he is solely responsible for film – Chennai News

In a press release in Tamil, which he posted on his timeline on Twitter, Gnanavel mentioned, “The welcome that ‘Jai Bhim’ got from all segments has brought us happiness. In the same way, I did not actually expect some opinions that have gone against the film.”

Claiming that he didn’t know {that a} calendar that was within the background could be construed as an id of a group, the director defined that the intention behind inserting the calendar there was solely to manifest the concept that the 12 months was 1995. “None of us had any intention of showing the calendar as an identity of any community,” the director clarified.

The calendar, which seems for only a few seconds within the film, didn’t be a magnet for any of the film’s unit, both throughout filming, nor throughout put up-manufacturing, Gnanavel mentioned.

Pointing out folks from completely different segments watched the film on the massive display screen, previous to its launch on Prime Video, director Gnanavel mentioned they’d have modified it, even when it had come to their discover at that time limit.

“When I got to know about the calendar from social media on the night of November 1, after the film had released on Prime Video, all efforts were made to immediately get the calendar changed on the morning of November 2 itself,” the director mentioned, including that he thought that the truth that that they had modified the calendar even earlier than anyone might ask for it, would make all people perceive that that they had no ulterior motive.

Stating that it was unlucky that actor Suriya was being requested to take duty for one thing that he, as director, was solely responsible for, Gnanavel mentioned he wished to precise his remorse for the problem it had precipitated to Suriya.

“As an actor and a producer of this film, Suriya’s only intention was to take the difficulties that indigenous people face to everybody,” the director mentioned.

The director mentioned that he firmly believed {that a} film was an artwork kind that caused concord between numerous communities.

Reiterating the purpose that they didn’t have any intention in any respect to insult any specific particular person or group by means of this film, the director mentioned that he expressed his heartfelt remorse to anyone who may need been harm due to this.

Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a pc program and has not been created or edited by FreshersLIVE.Publisher : IANS-Media
(Visited 5 times, 1 visits today)